In this article, we will delve deeper into the challenges faced in Test Data Management (TDM) and explore the various data demands scenarios. By understanding these challenges and scenarios, organizations can gain valuable insights into optimizing their TDM practices and ensuring the availability of high-quality test data.
Challenges of test data management
Effectively managing test data is essential to tackle the challenges posed by quality and time to market in software solutions. By addressing issues related to representative and fresh test data, privacy concerns, and streamlining the preparation process, organizations can enhance their testing practices and drive better outcomes.
Basically, the list of challenges can be endless, but a significant part of it will relate to either the quality or time-to-market aspects of a solution. In terms of quality, the core challenge that test data management aims to address is the leakage of defects into production caused by inadequate or outdated test data configurations. We are specifically referring to the following issues:
- Lack of relevant test data, which may necessitate more frequent copies of production data to the test environments.
- Lack of connection between the process under test and clearly defined data attributes, leading to potential misinterpretation of the entire test.
QA,
Sixsentix Germany
Data privacy is a crucial aspect that should never be overlooked. There have been instances in history where invoices were unintentionally sent to real customers from test systems, highlighting the importance of safeguarding sensitive data..
Regarding time-to-market considerations, the key problem lies in the extensive time and effort required for test data preparation, ultimately affecting the overall velocity of the team. This challenge is particularly relevant for systems with high data complexity, such as SAP solutions.
Data Demands Scenarios
To illustrate the complexity of data in SAP systems, let's explore some typical scenarios that demand different types of test data. These scenarios are applicable to both manual and automated testing and serve as common examples of data usage.
At the core of each process lies master data, encompassing materials, customers, vendors, and system configuration-related information such as sales and purchase organizations. From a data provision perspective, we can differentiate between two types of master data:
- Exhaustible master data: This data is consumed after test execution. For example, certain processes may only apply to newly signed customers or newly introduced materials, necessitating the continuous creation of fresh data for testing. Another example is stock availability, where the absence of material items in the warehouse halts further sales-related tests until the stock is replenished.
- Non-exhaustible master data: This data can be reused multiple times across scenarios, such as vendor information or price lists in customer master data.
The next layer is transactional data, which relies on the master data and includes contracts, sales or purchase orders, goods receipts, and delivery notes. Transactional data is generally exhaustible and aligns with three scenarios:
- generated through the execution of process steps in an end-to-end flow;
- mocked to facilitate specific standalone tests within an end-to-end process. For example, testing warehouse internal processes may involve manually increasing stock through activities like cycle counting and reporting inventory discrepancies. However, caution is needed to avoid reconciliation errors in subsequent processes;
- derived from integration with non-SAP or third-party systems, often posing challenges in terms of obtaining sufficient test instances and configuring them correctly. Automation may face additional technical limitations, such as incompatible test automation tools or network setup constraints. In such cases, manual posting of IDocs or XMLs can serve as a workaround, although integration aspects should be addressed in another stage of testing.
The last layer involves historical data or diverse data required for reporting, including solutions like BI/BW or QlikView reporting. In a broader sense, this data can be considered transactional but accumulated over a certain period. For example, forecasting processes may necessitate historical consumption data, which can be challenging to validate. One approach is to sequence multiple end-to-end processes in a way that generates data resembling historical patterns. Alternatively, data from migrated data sets or subsets can be utilized.
Conclusion
The effective Test Data Management is vital for overcoming the challenges of quality and time-to-market in software solutions. By addressing issues related to representative and fresh test data, data privacy, and streamlining the preparation process, organizations can elevate their testing practices and achieve better outcomes. Understanding the complexities of data demands, such as exhaustible and non-exhaustible master data, transactional data generation and mocking, and historical or diverse data requirements, is key to successful TDM implementation.
At Sixsentix, we specialize in Test Data Management solutions tailored to meet your specific needs. Contact us today to discover how our expertise and advanced tools can optimize your TDM process, enabling you to deliver high-quality software solutions efficiently and effectively.